Blockchain records have entered ordinary professional work. A criminal file arrives with a blockchain analysis report attached. A company’s accounts include a wallet balance that no bank statement confirms. An estate contains assets that no one in the family can locate. A bank has to decide whether to accept money whose earlier history sits on a public ledger. In each of these situations a regulated professional is asked to form a judgement about material they were never trained to read.
BIPA is developing a training programme for the professions affected by this shift: lawyers, accountants and auditors, notaries, and professionals working in banking, finance and compliance. The programme is designed to be delivered together with the bodies that recognise those professions, so that it fits their continuing professional development requirements rather than sitting outside them.
The programme assumes no prior knowledge. Participants are not expected to have any background in computing, blockchain or crypto-assets. Every technical notion is introduced from zero, in plain language, using comparisons with legal and financial concepts the audience already works with.
The shared part of the day covers what a crypto-asset, a wallet and an address actually are; what information stays permanently public and what does not; how crypto-assets appear in investment fraud, ransomware, drug trafficking, money laundering and tax evasion; and how an analysis report connects an address to a person or a company. That last point carries most of the practical weight. Attribution is produced by probabilistic methods and by databases built by private providers, whose sources and error margins are not always open to inspection. A report expressed in figures and diagrams looks exact. A meaningful part of what it concludes is an estimate.
-
01
Lawyers.
In criminal matters, the question is whether the analysis report in the file can be tested. Participants learn to separate verifiable fact from interpretation, to frame requests for technical expertise, and to ask where attribution data came from. The programme also covers freezing and confiscation of crypto-assets, and the practical risks these create for a client, including private key custody and the privilege against self-incrimination. -
02
Accountants and auditors.
Control of a wallet is not the same thing as ownership of it, and a balance visible on a public ledger is not by itself audit evidence of existence or of rights. Participants work on how to obtain and document proof of control, how to reconcile on-chain activity against the books, and which patterns in a client's records deserve a second look before they are signed off. -
03
Notaries.
Transactions increasingly involve consideration that originated in crypto-assets, which turns source of funds declarations into a substantive verification problem rather than a formality. Estates raise a separate difficulty: assets that exist but cannot be reached without keys, and heirs who have no way to establish what was held. -
04
Banking, finance and compliance.
The regulatory framework is now in place, and the questions have become operational. What do the European rules on crypto-assets and anti-money laundering require in practice, how does the information travel with a transfer, on what basis does an institution accept or refuse funds with a crypto history, and what makes a suspicious transaction report about crypto-assets useful rather than defensive.
The structure adapts to the audience. A chamber of notaries and a bar association receive the same foundation and a different second half of the day.
Participants do not watch demonstrations on a screen.
Each receives access for the professional analysis tools developed by IKNAIO Cryptoasset Analytics, the same tools used by authorities and analysts in real cases, and follows a flow of funds through a case built for teaching purposes. Roughly two hours of the day are spent working on their own laptops.
The purpose is not to turn a lawyer or an auditor into an analyst. It is to let them see from the inside how a conclusion in an analysis report is produced: what data supports it, where interpretation enters, and what can genuinely be tested. Objections and questions raised afterwards, in court or in an audit file, become concrete instead of formal.
The programme runs as a one-day session hosted by the professional body, for groups of minimum 20 and maximum 30 participants, with a participation fee of EUR 100 per person. Twenty is a firm minimum rather than a target, because the hands-on part of the day only makes sense at that scale. For the same reason the programme is delivered in person and is not offered online: participants work on their own laptops with live analysis tools, and the trainers need to be able to look over a shoulder when someone gets stuck, which is exactly the moment where the learning happens. A remote version would leave the lecture intact and lose the part that matters.
This differs from BIPA’s earlier programmes for public authorities, which were free and funded entirely by member contributions. The reason is specific: individual tool accounts, teaching datasets and technical support during the workshop carry direct costs. The fee covers organisation, and BIPA does not seek a profit from the programme. Delivery is planned for 2027.
The analysis tools are used for teaching only. The programme is not a purchase recommendation, and participants will not be approached by vendors afterwards. BIPA works with IKNAIO because IKNAIO supports the move towards open standards and interoperability, which would allow institutional users to hold independent analysis capability and to keep control of their data and methodology. Other providers who support that direction are welcome to take part on the same basis.
The same reasoning drives the rest of BIPA’s work: the Open Blockchain Intelligence Standards initiative, convened globally by BIPA together with ICI Bucharest and the Complexity Science Hub Vienna, and the proposal to recognise the Blockchain Analyst occupation in the European and Romanian occupational classifications.
Professional bodies interested in hosting an edition can write to
You can become a member of the Blockchain Intelligence Forum if you are a certified blockchain intelligence practitioner in a front-line organisation or company, within the European Union.